1942 GAZ M1 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 GAZ M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 GAZ M1 would be higher. At 3,285 cc (4 cylinders), 1942 GAZ M1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1942 GAZ M1. (49 HP @ 2800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1942 GAZ M1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 GAZ M1 weights approximately 596 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102.
Because 1942 GAZ M1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 GAZ M1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 GAZ M1 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | GAZ | Zastava |
| Model | M1 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 3285 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 2800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2160 mm |
