1942 Jeep MB vs. 1953 Singer SM 1500
To start off, 1953 Singer SM 1500 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Jeep MB would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1942 Jeep MB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Jeep MB (59 HP @ 3820 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1953 Singer SM 1500. (57 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Jeep MB should accelerate faster than 1953 Singer SM 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Singer SM 1500 weights approximately 104 kg more than 1942 Jeep MB.
Because 1942 Jeep MB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Singer SM 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1942 Jeep MB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1942 Jeep MB (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Singer SM 1500. (105 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1942 Jeep MB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Singer SM 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Jeep MB | 1953 Singer SM 1500 | |
Make | Jeep | Singer |
Model | MB | SM 1500 |
Year Released | 1942 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 3820 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1184 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3330 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2740 mm |