1942 Jeep MB vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1963 Lotus Elan is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Jeep MB would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1942 Jeep MB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus Elan (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1942 Jeep MB. (59 HP @ 3820 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1942 Jeep MB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Jeep MB weights approximately 486 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Because 1942 Jeep MB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1942 Jeep MB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1942 Jeep MB (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1942 Jeep MB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Jeep MB | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | MB | Elan |
Year Released | 1942 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 3820 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3330 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2140 mm |