1942 Jeep MB vs. 1968 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 1968 Toyota Corolla is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Jeep MB would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1942 Jeep MB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Jeep MB weights approximately 380 kg more than 1968 Toyota Corolla.
Because 1942 Jeep MB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Toyota Corolla. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1942 Jeep MB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1942 Jeep MB (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Toyota Corolla. (77 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1942 Jeep MB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Toyota Corolla.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Jeep MB | 1968 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Jeep | Toyota |
| Model | MB | Corolla |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1077 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3820 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 77 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3330 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2290 mm |
