1942 Jeep MB vs. 2003 Proton 400
To start off, 2003 Proton 400 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Jeep MB would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1942 Jeep MB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Proton 400 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1942 Jeep MB. (59 HP @ 3820 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Proton 400 should accelerate faster than 1942 Jeep MB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Jeep MB weights approximately 110 kg more than 2003 Proton 400.
Because 1942 Jeep MB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Proton 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1942 Jeep MB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1942 Jeep MB (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1942 Jeep MB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Jeep MB | 2003 Proton 400 | |
Make | Jeep | Proton |
Model | MB | 400 |
Year Released | 1942 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 3820 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3330 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2510 mm |