1942 Jeep MB vs. 2005 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2005 Subaru Forester is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Jeep MB would be higher. At 2,458 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Subaru Forester (166 HP) has 107 more horse power than 1942 Jeep MB. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1942 Jeep MB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Subaru Forester weights approximately 328 kg more than 1942 Jeep MB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Subaru Forester (225 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1942 Jeep MB. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1942 Jeep MB.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Jeep MB | 2005 Subaru Forester | |
| Make | Jeep | Subaru |
| Model | MB | Forester |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 2458 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 166 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 225 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1408 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3330 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2530 mm |
