1942 Jeep MB vs. 2009 Mazda 2
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Jeep MB would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1942 Jeep MB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 2 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1942 Jeep MB. (59 HP @ 3820 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1942 Jeep MB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Jeep MB weights approximately 120 kg more than 2009 Mazda 2.
Because 1942 Jeep MB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1942 Jeep MB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1942 Jeep MB (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 2. (137 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1942 Jeep MB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Jeep MB | 2009 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | MB | 2 |
Year Released | 1942 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 3820 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3330 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2500 mm |