1942 Jeep MB vs. 2010 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2010 Toyota Highlander is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Jeep MB would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Highlander (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1942 Jeep MB. (59 HP @ 3820 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1942 Jeep MB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 1025 kg more than 1942 Jeep MB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Highlander (287 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1942 Jeep MB. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1942 Jeep MB.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Jeep MB | 2010 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Jeep | Toyota |
Model | MB | Highlander |
Year Released | 1942 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 3300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 3820 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 287 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 2105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3330 mm | 4785 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2789 mm |