1942 Mercedes-Benz 320 vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320 would be higher. At 3,208 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (269 HP) has 191 more horse power than 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320. (78 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320 weights approximately 275 kg more than 2010 Kia Cadenza.
Because 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Mercedes-Benz 320 | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Kia |
Model | 320 | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1942 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3208 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 269 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2845 mm |