1942 Mercedes-Benz 320 vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 70 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 266 more horse power than 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320. (78 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320. (223 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320 | 2012 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Holden |
| Model | 320 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1942 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3208 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 223 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
