1942 Packard 12 vs. 2010 Mazda 3

To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Packard 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Packard 12 would be higher. At 7,755 cc (12 cylinders), 1942 Packard 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Packard 12 (173 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1942 Packard 12 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Packard 12 weights approximately 1120 kg more than 2010 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1942 Packard 12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Packard 12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda 3 has automatic transmission and 1942 Packard 12 has manual transmission. 1942 Packard 12 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: