1942 Peugeot 202 vs. 1964 Volvo 120
To start off, 1964 Volvo 120 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Volvo 120 (67 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1942 Peugeot 202. (30 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Volvo 120 should accelerate faster than 1942 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Volvo 120 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1942 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Peugeot 202 | 1964 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
| Model | 202 | 120 |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1133 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 30 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2610 mm |
