1942 Peugeot 202 vs. 1982 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 1982 Skoda Rapid R is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 1,287 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Skoda Rapid R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Skoda Rapid R (62 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1942 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Skoda Rapid R should accelerate faster than 1942 Peugeot 202.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1942 Peugeot 202 | 1982 Skoda Rapid R | |
| Make | Peugeot | Skoda |
| Model | 202 | Rapid R |
| Year Released | 1942 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1133 cc | 1287 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 30 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2410 mm |
