1942 Peugeot 202 vs. 2010 Honda Fit
To start off, 2010 Honda Fit is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Honda Fit is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Fit (117 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1942 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1942 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Fit weights approximately 358 kg more than 1942 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Peugeot 202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Peugeot 202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Peugeot 202 | 2010 Honda Fit | |
Make | Peugeot | Honda |
Model | 202 | Fit |
Year Released | 1942 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1132 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 117 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1143 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1524 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2499 mm |