1942 Renault Juva vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (85 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1942 Renault Juva. (24 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1942 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 319 kg more than 1942 Renault Juva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Renault Juva | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | Juva | 200 |
Year Released | 1942 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1003 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2510 mm |