1942 Simca 5 vs. 2010 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2010 Smart ForTwo is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Simca 5 would be higher. At 1,000 cc (3 cylinders), 2010 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Smart ForTwo (70 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1942 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1942 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 260 kg more than 1942 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1942 Simca 5 | 2010 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Simca | Smart |
Model | 5 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1942 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 570 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 14 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3220 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1280 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 1867 mm |