1943 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp
To start off, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp should accelerate faster than 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 99 kg more than 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1943 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Hudson |
Model | 6C | Super Wasp |
Year Released | 1943 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 90.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 111.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1599 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 75 L |