1943 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1986 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,590 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 (221 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Jaguar XJ6 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1943 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1986 Jaguar XJ6 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | 6C | XJ6 |
Year Released | 1943 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 3590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2880 mm |