1943 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1988 Acura Integra
To start off, 1988 Acura Integra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Acura Integra (125 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1943 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1988 Acura Integra | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Acura |
Model | 6C | Integra |
Year Released | 1943 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4355 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2520 mm |