1943 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 70 kg more than 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1943 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2000 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 6C | C |
Year Released | 1943 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 2148 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 88.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 88.3 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 69 L |