1943 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2006 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 15 kg more than 2006 Chrysler Crossfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1943 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2006 Chrysler Crossfire | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chrysler |
Model | 6C | Crossfire |
Year Released | 1943 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2442 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 60 L |