1943 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1943 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
| Model | 6C | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1943 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2442 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 96.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 102 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3010 mm |
