1943 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Renault Safrane
To start off, 2000 Renault Safrane is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,675 cc (8 cylinders), 1943 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1943 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 335 kg more than 2000 Renault Safrane.
Because 1943 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1943 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Safrane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1943 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Renault Safrane | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | 62 | Safrane |
Year Released | 1943 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5675 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1525 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2770 mm |