1943 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2001 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,675 cc (8 cylinders), 1943 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1943 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 115 kg more than 2001 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1943 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1943 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5675 cc | 3933 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 249 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1745 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2730 mm |
