1943 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Toyota Solara
To start off, 2002 Toyota Solara is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,675 cc (8 cylinders), 1943 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1943 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 465 kg more than 2002 Toyota Solara.
Because 1943 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1943 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Solara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1943 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Toyota Solara | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Solara |
Year Released | 1943 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5675 cc | 2438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 162 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1395 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2680 mm |