1943 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2003 Seat Arosa is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,675 cc (8 cylinders), 1943 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1943 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1000 kg more than 2003 Seat Arosa.
Because 1943 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1943 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1943 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Seat Arosa | |
Make | Cadillac | Seat |
Model | 62 | Arosa |
Year Released | 1943 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5675 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 49 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 860 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2330 mm |