1943 Rover P2 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Rover P2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Rover P2 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1943 Rover P2. (47 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1943 Rover P2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 370 kg more than 1943 Rover P2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1943 Rover P2 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Rover | Cadillac |
| Model | P2 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1943 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 1577 cc | 3173 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1790 kg |
