1943 Simca 5 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Simca 5 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1943 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1943 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1196 kg more than 1943 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1943 Simca 5 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Simca | Cadillac |
| Model | 5 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1943 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 570 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 14 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3220 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1280 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2880 mm |
