1943 Skoda Superb vs. 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1943 Skoda Superb is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,137 cc (6 cylinders), 1943 Skoda Superb is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1943 Skoda Superb. (79 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1943 Skoda Superb.
Because 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1943 Skoda Superb, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1943 Skoda Superb | 1939 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Skoda | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Superb | 6C |
Year Released | 1943 | 1939 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3137 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3420 mm | 3010 mm |