1943 Skoda Superb vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 70 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Skoda Superb. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Skoda Superb would be higher. At 3,137 cc (6 cylinders), 1943 Skoda Superb is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1943 Skoda Superb. (79 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1943 Skoda Superb.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1943 Skoda Superb | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Skoda | Chevrolet |
| Model | Superb | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1943 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3137 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4771 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3420 mm | 2857 mm |
