1943 Volvo PV 801-10 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 69 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (318 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1943 Volvo PV 801-10. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1943 Volvo PV 801-10.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 has manual transmission. 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Volvo | Cadillac |
| Model | PV 801-10 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1943 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 3670 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 318 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 3260 mm | 2880 mm |
