1944 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1951 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1951 Cadillac 62 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Cadillac 62 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. (90 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 252 kg more than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1944 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1951 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 6C | 62 |
Year Released | 1944 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 5422 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 96.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 92.1 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1752 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3210 mm |