1944 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1963 Ford Cortina
To start off, 1963 Ford Cortina is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C (90 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1963 Ford Cortina | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | 6C | Cortina |
| Year Released | 1944 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 58.1 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 50 L |
