1944 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1972 Austin 2200
To start off, 1972 Austin 2200 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Austin 2200 (110 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. (90 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Austin 2200 should accelerate faster than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 319 kg more than 1972 Austin 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1944 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1972 Austin 2200 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | 6C | 2200 |
Year Released | 1944 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2227 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 81.3 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1181 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 56 L |