1944 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1976 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1976 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. (90 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 650 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1976 Mazda RX-3 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
| Model | 6C | RX-3 |
| Year Released | 1944 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 65 L |
