1944 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1980 Mazda 929
To start off, 1980 Mazda 929 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C (90 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 350 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1980 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
| Model | 6C | 929 |
| Year Released | 1944 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 88 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 65 L |
