1944 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1981 Audi 80
To start off, 1981 Audi 80 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Audi 80 (136 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. (90 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 310 kg more than 1981 Audi 80.
Because 1981 Audi 80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Audi 80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1981 Audi 80 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Audi |
| Model | 6C | 80 |
| Year Released | 1944 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 136 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2550 mm |
