1944 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1996 Lada 110
To start off, 1996 Lada 110 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C (90 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1996 Lada 110. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada 110.
Because 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1944 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1996 Lada 110 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lada |
Model | 6C | 110 |
Year Released | 1944 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 71 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2500 mm |