1944 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1999 Lotus GT 1
To start off, 1999 Lotus GT 1 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lotus GT 1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotus GT 1 (573 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 483 more horse power than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. (90 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotus GT 1 should accelerate faster than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 450 kg more than 1999 Lotus GT 1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1944 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1999 Lotus GT 1 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lotus |
Model | 6C | GT 1 |
Year Released | 1944 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3504 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 573 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2690 mm |