1944 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (419 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 329 more horse power than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. (90 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 191 kg more than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1944 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2009 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Dodge |
Model | 6C | Challenger |
Year Released | 1944 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 6059 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 419 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 72 L |