1944 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 66 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 466 more horse power than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. (90 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 415 kg more than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1944 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2010 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 6C | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1944 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 556 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 68 L |