1944 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2010 Nissan 370Z
To start off, 2010 Nissan 370Z is newer by 66 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan 370Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan 370Z (350 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. (90 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan 370Z should accelerate faster than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 3 kg more than 2010 Nissan 370Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1944 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2010 Nissan 370Z | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Nissan |
Model | 6C | 370Z |
Year Released | 1944 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1497 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4427 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1316 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 72 L |