1944 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando (174 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. (90 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 100 kg more than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1944 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2011 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | 6C | Orlando |
Year Released | 1944 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2760 mm |