1944 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2012 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2012 Lotus Evora is newer by 68 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. (90 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1944 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2012 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Lotus |
Model | 6C | Evora |
Year Released | 1944 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4341 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1222 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2576 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 59 L |