1944 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 69 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. (90 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 114 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Lotus |
| Model | 6C | Evora |
| Year Released | 1944 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 83 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2575 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 60 L |
