1944 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 69 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 115 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mini |
| Model | 6C | Countryman |
| Year Released | 1944 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1385 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 47 L |
