1944 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2013 Nissan Cube

To start off, 2013 Nissan Cube is newer by 69 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Cube (120 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. (90 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 228 kg more than 2013 Nissan Cube.

Because 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1944 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1944 Alfa Romeo 6C 2013 Nissan Cube
Make Alfa Romeo Nissan
Model 6C Cube
Year Released 1944 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2443 cc 1800 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 90 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 72 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 81 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1500 kg 1272 kg
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 3980 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1695 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1650 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2530 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 77 L 50 L