1944 Cadillac 61 vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Cadillac 61. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Cadillac 61 would be higher. At 5,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1944 Cadillac 61 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Mustang (187 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1944 Cadillac 61. (123 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1944 Cadillac 61. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Cadillac 61 weights approximately 490 kg more than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1944 Cadillac 61 | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 61 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1944 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5276 cc | 3801 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1410 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2580 mm |