1944 Cadillac 61 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Cadillac 61. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Cadillac 61 would be higher. At 5,276 cc (8 cylinders), 1944 Cadillac 61 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1944 Cadillac 61. (123 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1944 Cadillac 61.
Compare all specifications:
| 1944 Cadillac 61 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 61 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1944 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5276 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2840 mm |
