1944 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,676 cc (8 cylinders), 1944 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1944 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 673 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 1944 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1944 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1944 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Impala |
Year Released | 1944 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5676 cc | 3786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1860 kg | 1187 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2720 mm |